Who would have thought it: First, the fabric of the old castle hotel was also in the construction of luxury apartments will be preserved and restored, then put the client determine that, surprisingly, but unfortunately we had to tear down everything, as dilapidated. Bad luck!
The Incredible operation around this new blight on the Heidelberg-Panorama system. Other projects, like the old days in-villa on the mountain road in New Home, were on the same principle shot assault.
Here the investor is an old, known as a strong restaurierungsbedüftig building was purchased, but only a moment later, "surprising," noted that the walls are wet and you have to tear down the historic mansion. "With a restoration of the existing buildings here, one can not do business with the subsequent sale of the apartments." You have to imagine the times: a professional investor buys million an old, dilapidated property, claiming afterwards, he had not known was what state the object. This is not stupid, but outrageous to want to piss the public Sun
was even bolder then the project's Palace Hotel. Here is one of the largest and most experienced construction firms (high-low) the builder. Too bad that this DAX Group has tens of thousands of employees, not civil in the house who can judge an old building to its condition ...
We must of course SOS Heidelberg ask: Who bears responsibility for that in both cases (and others, such as Möchhofstraße and Luther Street in New Home, 2005) subsequently demolition permits granted for a listed building? As such a "mistake" disguised insolence of construction companies and greedy investors but should a municipality not later reward yet!
And in the next step, the question arises, why give government officials in such indisputable demolition permits. Who has the advantages of it? here someone else is rewarded?
We stay tuned and look up times, the names that appear in this context where. Perhaps one or the other bloggers here, here are the completed research?
0 comments:
Post a Comment